468x80 Banner

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

snook

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Next time tell the guy the limit is between 24" to 28" maximum, so his snook shoulda been at least 24". Can't tell exactly by the pic, but it would be stretching it to make 24", so he should have released it.


    A darn good rule to follow is:

    If ya don't know what it is and what the rules are, release the fish. It may save ya some hefty fine by the GW.
    "Hey Hillary, regarding the Benghazi Attack on 9/11-we'll just blame it on that movie, not my total lack of security. By the way, what's so significant about 9/11 anyway-was that a date my buddy Bill Ayers of the Weather Underground blew up a government building?" asked Obama to Hillary. BEAUTIFY AMERICA, RUN OVER A LIBERAL, THEN BACK UP AND SEE IF HE'S DEAD.

    Comment


    • #17
      water quality has been improving. Each fall we've seen more and more snook catches coming out of the Brazos, San Bernard, and Colorado.. I think they summer high up in the rivers in deeper water, no-one goes after them / not enough known about our local snook.
      TroutSupport.comsigpic

      Comment


      • #18
        I hear of some being caught in the Christmas area a few years back, but this is the first I have heard of one in some time. Shame he did not release it.
        LIVIN THE SALT LIFE

        Comment

        Working...
        X