468x80 Banner

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obamacare upheld

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    You are wasting your time arguing with nit-wits...
    A nit wit is some one who makes a bad argument, and then quits debating. If y'all want a little republican lovefest, then start another site. I am trying to engage y'all in debate to learn more and all I get is name calling and quitting. Like I said, I am an independent, and am looking for ideas and supporting facts.

    Now bring on the debate damnit and leave your feelings at the door!

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Tidalguide View Post
      I think they do mail pretty well...
      are they profitable?????? NOPE we pay for them to be in busisness.... i should get to send mail for free since i pay for them to opperate with my tax money that keeps them in busisness. i would rather pay UPS or FedEx to deliver a letter then get taxed to keep a the USPS around & still have to pay to send a letter.

      there are no more republicans or democrats they are all just CROOKS & COMMUNIST!!!

      that is why i am a patriot


      watching meet the press right now ... a reporter is asking Pelosi about Obummercare being a tax & that was not the way it was presented to the american people. she comes back with ...."its not a tax .... its a penalty ... under the tax code" WTF kind of double talk is that ... she is lying to my face ... she is peeing on my foot & trying to tell me its raining!!!!
      www.lonestarkayakseries.com

      Comment


      • #63
        if they wanted to fix the health care they should have reformed medicade, medicare & open up free trade with the insurance companys ... people already qualify for those programs ... there is no reason to come up with a whole new program that effects everyone.


        Obummer talks about paying your fair share .... ONLY 53% OF AMERICANS PAY TAXES ... that leaves 47% not paying to the system .... how am i not paying my fair share????????
        The latest news and headlines from Yahoo! News. Get breaking news stories and in-depth coverage with videos and photos.
        www.lonestarkayakseries.com

        Comment


        • #64
          are they profitable??????
          I am not sure. I would assume no since they will be cutting back significantly.

          "its not a tax .... its a penalty ... under the tax code" WTF kind of double talk is that ... she is lying to my face ... she is peeing on my foot & trying to tell me its raining!!!!
          I agree that is a dumb play. I would position it as a cost; tax, penalty what ever you want to call it. Typically tax's are classified on money spent or earned. Since no money is being spent (not buying healthcare), then it does lean more towards a penalty.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Tidalguide View Post
            Since no money is being spent (not buying healthcare), then it does lean more towards a penalty.
            SO THAT MEANS OBUMMERCARE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL .... thank you for making my point!!!!
            www.lonestarkayakseries.com

            Comment


            • #66
              Since no money is being spent (not buying healthcare), then it does lean more towards a penalty.
              SO THAT MEANS OBUMMERCARE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL .... thank you for making my point!!!!
              Ok, can you show us where in the constitution it says this or infers it?

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by H.Maier View Post
                Hmmm... UPS, Fed-Ex, Emery Air freight, etc. isn't competing with USPS. See if they will deliver your letter across the country for less than a dollar. lmao. I don't want to get into calling names and other juvenile behavior but when we lose the post office and other government entities to privatization then we'll really have something to beetch about.
                It's a horizontal monopoly. Stick a letter and your mail box and see if anyone but a government employee picks it up.

                Article I, section 8, Clause 7 of the United States Constitution grants Congress the power to establish post offices and post roads, which has been interpreted as a de facto Congressional monopoly over the delivery of mail. Accordingly, no other system for delivering mail – public or private – can be established, absent Congress's consent.
                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...onopoly_status

                I don't want to get into name calling and other juvenile behavior, but the less government is involved in our lives the less we'll have to beetch about.
                What Would Hans Wagemueller Do?

                Comment


                • #68
                  can you show me where it does?

                  ummm... the whole whole reason Obummercare went to the supreme court was that is was unconstitutional as a "PENALTY" ... then Roberts found somewhere its now "TAX".

                  make up your mind a TAX or PENALTTY! Obummer & all the other goons have said it is not a TAX

                  my dad was a double amputee ... he had no legs. he lost his first one when i was 3yrs old & the 2nd when i was 9yrs old. i grew up on social security & was pretty poor growing up. my dad past away back in 2000 ... trust me there is nothing i would love more than my dad to be here today & i think he could be here if his medical care was better. so i know first hand how this type of medical care works ... you think its going to be better with Obummercare.

                  i have done pretty well for myself since i graduated from high school ... all by myself no help from anyone ... i made sheet happen so i could live better.... dare i mention that i am part mexican too. so i was poor growing up & a minority. i had just as much hardship & troubles growing up as most people claiming they are being held down. they have had every oppertunity to better themselfs just as i did.

                  Im done here
                  www.lonestarkayakseries.com

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by EZ-E View Post
                    can you show me where it does?

                    ummm... the whole whole reason Obummercare went to the supreme court was that is was unconstitutional as a "PENALTY" ... then Roberts found somewhere its now "TAX".

                    make up your mind a TAX or PENALTTY! Obummer & all the other goons have said it is not a TAX

                    my dad was a double amputee ... he had no legs. he lost his first one when i was 3yrs old & the 2nd when i was 9yrs old. i grew up on social security & was pretty poor growing up. my dad past away back in 2000 ... trust me there is nothing i would love more than my dad to be here today & i think he could be here if his medical care was better. so i know first hand how this type of medical care works ... you think its going to be better with Obummercare.

                    i have done pretty well for myself since i graduated from high school ... all by myself no help from anyone ... i made sheet happen so i could live better.... dare i mention that i am part mexican too. so i was poor growing up & a minority. i had just as much hardship & troubles growing up as most people claiming they are being held down. they have had every oppertunity to better themselfs just as i did.

                    Im done here
                    I appreciate the story and am glad you have done well for yourself. Again, I am simply asking for facts to help me in my research. I will assume since you did not provide any that they do not exist.

                    My stance is very simple on healthcare. Children should be taken care of. I am not worried about adults, we can fend for ourselves.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      excises shall be uniform .... how are they uniform if only 53% of the population has to pay taxes




                      Section 8

                      1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


                      ex·cise
                      1


















































                      (ksz)n.1. An internal tax imposed on the production, sale, or consumption of a commodity or the use of a service within a country: excises on tobacco, liquor, and long-distance telephone calls.
                      2. A licensing charge or a fee levied for certain privileges.

                      tr.v. ex·cised, ex·cis·ing, ex·cis·es To levy an excise on.


                      www.lonestarkayakseries.com

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        excises shall be uniform .... how are they uniform if only 53% of the population has to pay taxes






                        Section 8


                        1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


                        ex·cise
                        1


                        (ksz)n.1. An internal tax imposed on the production, sale, or consumption of a commodity or the use of a service within a country: excises on tobacco, liquor, and long-distance telephone calls.
                        2. A licensing charge or a fee levied for certain privileges.

                        tr.v. ex·cised, ex·cis·ing, ex·cis·es To levy an excise on.


                        www.lonestarkayakseries.com

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by EZ-E View Post
                          excises shall be uniform .... how are they uniform if only 53% of the population has to pay taxes






                          Section 8


                          1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;


                          ex·cise
                          1


                          (ksz)n.1. An internal tax imposed on the production, sale, or consumption of a commodity or the use of a service within a country: excises on tobacco, liquor, and long-distance telephone calls.
                          2. A licensing charge or a fee levied for certain privileges.

                          tr.v. ex·cised, ex·cis·ing, ex·cis·es To levy an excise on.


                          http://www.thefreedictionary.com/excised
                          EZ-E...I told you before, its a waste of your time arguing with nit-wits and now it appears wise asses

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            EZ-E...I told you before, its a waste of your time arguing with nit-wits and now it appears wise asses
                            JT, pretty obvious who the nit wit is...And who is arguing?

                            EZ thanks for the info. I am still not understanding how a penalty is unconstitutional?

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Sorry folks. It is a TAX-it is the largest TAX increase in history and that is a fact.

                              The trolling on other issues is smoke and mirrors-one issue is saying Big Oil gets "SUBSIDIES" is BS-they get TAX DEDUCTIONS not SUBSIDIES. Farmers get SUBSIDIES-the use of subsidies in reference to oil is a DEMOCRATIC FALSEHOOD!!!

                              The problem with OBamaCare is the FACT that it is now a TAX. IT WAS NOT TO BE A TAX-JUST ASK OBAMA AND HE SAID THAT OVER AND OVER-IT IS NOW A TAX. THE I.R.S. ENFORCES IT AND THE IRS CAN PUT YOU ON THE STREET PENNILESS-IT HAPPENS QUITE OFTEN-IN FACT YOU MAY BE SENT TO PRISON FOR FAILING TO PAY THE TAX!! BEING A TAX, IT IS TREATED THE SAME AS ANY INCOME TAX AND SUBJECT TO PENALTIES AND INTEREST AND ULTIMATELY LIEN RIGHTS AND FORECLOSURE RIGHTS.

                              DON'T BELIEVE ME, ASK YOUR SENATOR OR CALL THE IRS. IS THIS REALLY WHAT YOU WANTED? FOLKS LOSING EVERYTHING BECAUSE OF A SILLY TAX? WAKE UP.

                              AS FAR AS SOME PONTS IN OBAMACARE,YES WE NEED HEALTH CARE REFORM TO RI9D EXCLUSIONS FOR PRE-EXIISTING CONDITIONS AND LIFETIME LIMITS (WHICH I AINT SO SURE WE NEED TO KEEP FOLKS THAT ARE BRAINDEAD ON LIFE SUPPORT FIOREVER WHICH NOW IT MAY FORCE HOSPITALS TO DO AND WE PAY FOR IT-ABOUT $30,000/DAY PER PERSON. BUT THE PROBLEM IS THE WELL-INTENTIONED PROVISIONS GOT FARGED UP BY BS AND WE ARE SCREWED. IT WILL NEVER BE PERFECT, BUT THE OBAMACARE ACT IS VERY POORLY WRITTEN, BECAME A "TAX" AND DOES NOT TREAT TAXPAYERS FAIRLY-IT PUTS THE BURDEN ON FOLKS THAT [PAY TAXES AND INCREASESTHEIR TAX BURDEN MORE THAN ANY PREVIOUS TAX INCREASE IN HISTORY.

                              [B]ALSO, OBAMACARE PUTS YOUR "FISHING GUIDES" ON MEDICAID-ONLY IF THEY DO NOT MAKE OVER $12,000/YEAR, MR. TIDALGUIDE-ALL OTHER GUIDES ARE REQUIRED TO PURCHASE HEALTH INSURANCE-PERIOD.[/B] AND YOUR PURCHASE HELPS SUBSIDIZE THE NEW 30,000,000 FOLKS THAT DO NOT PURCHASE INSURANCE.
                              "Hey Hillary, regarding the Benghazi Attack on 9/11-we'll just blame it on that movie, not my total lack of security. By the way, what's so significant about 9/11 anyway-was that a date my buddy Bill Ayers of the Weather Underground blew up a government building?" asked Obama to Hillary. BEAUTIFY AMERICA, RUN OVER A LIBERAL, THEN BACK UP AND SEE IF HE'S DEAD.

                              Comment


                              • #75

                                Sorry folks. It is a TAX-it is the largest TAX increase in history and that is a fact.
                                Robalo, that is not a true statement. This tax increase is lower then Reagan's of the early 80's...Please see my earlier post.

                                http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/spinning-the-supreme-court-ruling-on-obamacare/2012/06/28/gJQAuuou9V_blog.html


                                Here is the text:

                                "A 2006 Treasury Department study listed a tax increase passed in 1942 as the clear winner for the title of biggest tax increase — worth more than 5 percent of GDP. (Yikes, now that’s a tax increase. But the United States was fighting a world war at the time.)

                                The health-care law doesn’t even come close — 0.49 percent of GDP. That’s one-tenth the size of the 1942 tax cut. Essentially, the health-care law’s taxes are about the size of Bill Clinton’s 1993 tax increase and significantly smaller than Ronald Reagan’s 1982 tax hike. (Our friends at PolitiFact beat us to the punch on this, awarding “Pants on Fire” to Limbaugh, and they have all of the math, plus other statistics.) "

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X