468x80 Banner

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It's called a telephone. You have one. Use it.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • It's called a telephone. You have one. Use it.

    You know, I really don't understand our world today.

    In May of 1844 Samuel B. Morse sent the first long distance telegraph message from the Capitol in Washington, D.C. Quoting Numbers 23:23, he sent the words, "What hath God wrought?" This advance in science heralded a worldwide communication revolution. For the first time, one could communicate almost instantly over long distances. That was 1844.

    Is soon became obvious that the telegraph, while revolutionary was not the perfect form of communication. It required sending a message in code, onerous for individuals not trained in the code, and of course it had to be de-coded on the receiving end. In other words it was not a consumer ready technology available to the individual.

    Further advances in communication technology led in 1876 to Alexander Graham Bell's telephone. The telephone was the perfect communication device. You could hear the other person and they could hear you. You could have an instantaneous back and forth conversation with a real person. For the first time, there was real human contact over long distances.

    The information super highway arrived in the 1990s, making the world an even smaller place with the instantaneous exchange of massive amounts of information now possible, everyone had to wonder what could be next.

    The cell phone was the next big thing. Once the device was "perfected" and networks spawned to carry the calls, this was a great thing for people who wanted to be connected to others at any time. Of course there were bad things about this. Instead of paying attention to the people you were with, you sometimes rudely decided to have a phone conversation instead. Some people had these things attached to their ears all the time. Too much of a good thing perhaps.

    What would come next? Well, we have seemingly come as far as we can, so why not go back to the past and revive an old idea? The telegraph? Sure, now lets perfect it by putting it in the hands of individuals and making it as simple as possible to send messages using the alphabet rather than using a code.

    I can only imagine how stupid this must have sounded when the idea was first broached. Telecommunication companies knew something though. They knew that a majority of people are not very smart. They knew that especially young people, not so sure of themselves in the spoken word, would flock to a simple way to send simple messages without having to actually interface with another human being. Instead of consumers seeing texting for what it is, a backwards step, they saw it for some reason unbeknownst to me, as a revotionary step forward. Stupid is what it was, and stupid is what it is.

    Texting is anti-social, and a clear step back in convenience for anyone with any true social skills. Now we have people who are addicted to texting. They cannot hold a real conversation with another human being, but their thumbs are stronger than ever. How useful.

    Stop the madness now. Pick up a phone and talk to a friend today. It's social. It's real. It's the power of the human voice. Oh, and it's not 1844.
    From 1970-1997, true heaven on Earth existed on the banks of Bayou Cook. "Hey Dad, Thanks for buying the Camp."

  • #2
    Originally posted by coachlaw View Post
    You know, I really don't understand our world today.

    In May of 1844 Samuel B. Morse sent the first long distance telegraph message from the Capitol in Washington, D.C. Quoting Numbers 23:23, he sent the words, "What hath God wrought?" This advance in science heralded a worldwide communication revolution. For the first time, one could communicate almost instantly over long distances. That was 1844.

    Is soon became obvious that the telegraph, while revolutionary was not the perfect form of communication. It required sending a message in code, onerous for individuals not trained in the code, and of course it had to be de-coded on the receiving end. In other words it was not a consumer ready technology available to the individual.

    Further advances in communication technology led in 1876 to Alexander Graham Bell's telephone. The telephone was the perfect communication device. You could hear the other person and they could hear you. You could have an instantaneous back and forth conversation with a real person. For the first time, there was real human contact over long distances.

    The information super highway arrived in the 1990s, making the world an even smaller place with the instantaneous exchange of massive amounts of information now possible, everyone had to wonder what could be next.

    The cell phone was the next big thing. Once the device was "perfected" and networks spawned to carry the calls, this was a great thing for people who wanted to be connected to others at any time. Of course there were bad things about this. Instead of paying attention to the people you were with, you sometimes rudely decided to have a phone conversation instead. Some people had these things attached to their ears all the time. Too much of a good thing perhaps.

    What would come next? Well, we have seemingly come as far as we can, so why not go back to the past and revive an old idea? The telegraph? Sure, now lets perfect it by putting it in the hands of individuals and making it as simple as possible to send messages using the alphabet rather than using a code.

    I can only imagine how stupid this must have sounded when the idea was first broached. Telecommunication companies knew something though. They knew that a majority of people are not very smart. They knew that especially young people, not so sure of themselves in the spoken word, would flock to a simple way to send simple messages without having to actually interface with another human being. Instead of consumers seeing texting for what it is, a backwards step, they saw it for some reason unbeknownst to me, as a revotionary step forward. Stupid is what it was, and stupid is what it is.

    Texting is anti-social, and a clear step back in convenience for anyone with any true social skills. Now we have people who are addicted to texting. They cannot hold a real conversation with another human being, but their thumbs are stronger than ever. How useful.

    Stop the madness now. Pick up a phone and talk to a friend today. It's social. It's real. It's the power of the human voice. Oh, and it's not 1844.
    get with the program coach!!!lmao!! youre rite though but I do text!!
    MANVEL MOB

    Comment


    • #3
      What I don't like are those people who you call, and they don't answer, then you immediately text them and they reply. WTF? You obviously saw me call.

      Comment


      • #4
        ...but texting is so "in"

        Comment


        • #5

          Comment


          • #6
            As my buddy buddy "JBird" says... "I can send out 20 wanna "hook up" later in one push of a button"
            We are West End Anglers, a saltwater tribe!

            Comment


            • #7
              my daughter is stupid with that texting .......... now there's people texting and driving its bad enough people and driving with cell phone glued to there ear...get a bluetooth
              I LIVE IN A SMALL COMMUNITY WITH A LARGE PROBLEM AND A PROBLEM.

              Comment


              • #8
                .... . .-.. .-.. --- / -.-. --- .- -.-. ....

                .... --- .-- / .. ... / -- -.-- / - . -..- - .. -. --.

                I was a navy sig. Visual communications was my trained job.
                I think I'll start texting everyone in morse code to start a new trend.
                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBLbrJxGtro
                Not that much different than a Karankawa indian hunting the shallows at night with a torch and a spear.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Woa, what set you off. Take a deep breath and have a beer. I have an employee who when she has a break between patients , is constantly checking her text messages and texting. She's not abusing her work time , so I can't complain, but it drives me nuts. Usually, they text about nothing. Coach, you're not in the hip generation anymore. Remember, both of us have old cell phones still that you have to wind up with a key.
                  GEORGE A. BRANARD, COLOR SERGEANT, CO. L, 1 ST TEXAS INFANTRY, HOOD'S TEXAS BRIGADE, C.S.A. : S.C.V.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Texting......problem or good thing??????

                    Sandy I basically agree with your stance on the overuse of texting, however I have found it useful up in the woods. I can send the wife an "I'm Still Alive" text when I don't have a signal to make a call. So it does have a real purpose, but as with most things, the young folks have turned it not to something else.........
                    Pro Staff - Bounty Hunter Turbo Buzz, Creme Lures, New Pro Products, & K9 Fishing Fluorocarbon

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by dbarham View Post
                      get with the program coach!!!lmao!! youre rite though but I do text!!


                      yes you do!!!!!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I think my daughter would literally die if she could not text. She typically will have over 10,000 texts in a month. It drives me crazy, but that is how
                        our kids communicate. BTW, she pays her own cell phone bill.
                        Why put off doing something today, when you can do it again tomorrow. LIKE FISHING!!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Gilbert View Post
                          yes you do!!!!!
                          naw dude!!
                          MANVEL MOB

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I can see using it at times when making a call is not possible, like during the Rita evac. My point is it should not be a person's main mode of communication.
                            From 1970-1997, true heaven on Earth existed on the banks of Bayou Cook. "Hey Dad, Thanks for buying the Camp."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by coachlaw View Post
                              Texting is anti-social, and a clear step back in convenience for anyone with any true social skills. Now we have people who are addicted to texting. They cannot hold a real conversation with another human being, but their thumbs are stronger than ever. How useful.

                              Stop the madness now. Pick up a phone and talk to a friend today. It's social. It's real. It's the power of the human voice. Oh, and it's not 1844.
                              These statements could be the basis of a pulitzer prize if written and presented correctly
                              "Dream Team Charter Member" Only the best can lay claim to it.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X