Not even a smidgen, nothing to see here

[mgstei1]

It won't be long or may have already happened that 2/3rds of the senate democrats have turned against him. In that case, his pen is worthless.

You really believe that 2/3s are gonna vote against him ?
You need to study up on how political parties operate and function.
His veto still will be more powerful than both Congresses voting 100% on a bill.
If the GOP takes over both Houses than we are doomed for ever getting anything done without some give and take.
Its been that way already with just 1 house being different party controlled.

[boom]

A presidential veto is a veto, no matter who or how many want the bill passed.
His pen is ready. And the dems are controlled by the party officials not by Obama. Same thing with the GOP.

It won't be long or may have already happened that 2/3rds of the senate democrats have turned against him. In that case, his pen is worthless.

[mgstei1]

It's a clown show!

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2014/10/22/wasserman-schultz-wont-say-if-voting-d-continuation-policies-o?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=marketing&utm_term=facebook&utm_content=facebook&utm_campaign=dws-obama-runs

Add Debbie Wasserman Schultz to the list of Dem politicians running away from Barack Obama. Kind of ironic, no, given that DWS is Chair of the Dem party and President Obama is its standard bearer? On today's Morning Joe, repeatedly pressed by Joe Scarborough as to whether voting for Dem candidates means a continuation of President Obama's policies, Wasserman Schultz refused to answer. Instead, the DNC Chair trotted out shop-worn lines about Obama not being on the ballot, Dems "having your back," etc.
After she departed, Scarborough got in a goodbye shot: "It's ridiculous. People that voted with the president 95, 96, 97, 98% of the time can't say his name."

JOE SCARBOROUGH: So should voters know that if they go out and vote for a Democratic candidate, they will be voting for a continuation of Barack Obama's policies?
DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: Voters should that know when they go out and vote for a Democratic candidate, that they are voting for someone who has their back, who's going to focus on strengthening our economy, getting the economy to focus on job creation.
SCARBOROUGH: But I'm asking as it pertains to Barack Obama. This is a question that a lot of people are asked.
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: You know, Joe, Barack Obama was on the ballot in 2012 and 2008. The candidates that are on the ballot are Democratic and Republican candidates for congress, the U.S. Senate, governors across the country.
SCARBOROUGH: Right, Debbie, but my question is -- it's a legitimate question and there is not a wrong answer and.
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: No, no, it's a legitimate question.
SCARBOROUGH: And if the president has done a great job, Debbiel, if you vote for Democrats, are you voting for a continuation of Barack Obama's policies? He says, yes, you are, do you agree with the president?
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: If you vote for Democrats, you are voting for candidates who are focused on creating jobs, getting the economy turned around and continuing to move us forward, creating more opportunities for people to succeed. If you vote for a Republican, you are voting for someone who has embraced the Tea Party agenda, who would double down on obstruction and who would stop us from moving forward.
. . .
SCARBOROUGH: It's ridiculous. You have people that voted with the president 95, 96, 97, 98% of the time --
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Who can't say his name.
SCARBOROUGH: Can't say his name. They say: you send me up there, I'm going to be a pain in his backside. It's a joke! It's a clown show!

- See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-fi....QZvrTy5a.dpuf

Hey Boom, I'll be voting for his policies.
And I take it your voting for the party that has no ideas or solutions but love the word NO.

[mgstei1]

LOL...some how I have a hard time believing you did much else but sit around and complain about the haves vs have nots. I imagine you've done that your entire life.

Do you imagine this stuff or do you just believe that you are the only person that has ever done any kind of work ?
Yes, I have always complained. Not so much about the have nots, but the haves.
Just remember, we are all in this together at this time in history.

[mgstei1]

The real clown show is the GOP having civil war between the moderate republicans and the TPers.
Fear and intimidation and shutting down the government and costing billions is the clown show.

[mgstei1]

I guess folks got all the HOPE they could stand and want what CHANGE they have left in their pockets to pay the higher taxes Comrade Obama stuck on the Middle Class while he blew smoke up their azzes while hanging with his 1%er buddies like BNSF Buffett. Buffett's cleaning up on railroads while his bestest lying bud Obama still sits on KXL. I know why but the blind ignorants still think it's because of the 'environment'-yeah sure it is, all the while BNSF is now changing "CHOO CHOO" to "KA CHING".

The only people that will be helped by Keystone are not Americans. That's my rub with it. Its for the Canadians,Indians, and the Chinese.

[mgstei1]

Congressional democrats will fall right in line and start overruling his vetoes. Come on Nov 4th!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A presidential veto is a veto, no matter who or how many want the bill passed.
His pen is ready. And the dems are controlled by the party officials not by Obama. Same thing with the GOP.

[boom]

It's a clown show!

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2014/10/22/wasserman-schultz-wont-say-if-voting-d-continuation-policies-o?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=marketing&utm_term=facebook&utm_content=facebook&utm_campaign=dws-obama-runs

Add Debbie Wasserman Schultz to the list of Dem politicians running away from Barack Obama. Kind of ironic, no, given that DWS is Chair of the Dem party and President Obama is its standard bearer? On today's Morning Joe, repeatedly pressed by Joe Scarborough as to whether voting for Dem candidates means a continuation of President Obama's policies, Wasserman Schultz refused to answer. Instead, the DNC Chair trotted out shop-worn lines about Obama not being on the ballot, Dems "having your back," etc.
After she departed, Scarborough got in a goodbye shot: "It's ridiculous. People that voted with the president 95, 96, 97, 98% of the time can't say his name."

JOE SCARBOROUGH: So should voters know that if they go out and vote for a Democratic candidate, they will be voting for a continuation of Barack Obama's policies?
DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: Voters should that know when they go out and vote for a Democratic candidate, that they are voting for someone who has their back, who's going to focus on strengthening our economy, getting the economy to focus on job creation.
SCARBOROUGH: But I'm asking as it pertains to Barack Obama. This is a question that a lot of people are asked.
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: You know, Joe, Barack Obama was on the ballot in 2012 and 2008. The candidates that are on the ballot are Democratic and Republican candidates for congress, the U.S. Senate, governors across the country.
SCARBOROUGH: Right, Debbie, but my question is -- it's a legitimate question and there is not a wrong answer and.
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: No, no, it's a legitimate question.
SCARBOROUGH: And if the president has done a great job, Debbiel, if you vote for Democrats, are you voting for a continuation of Barack Obama's policies? He says, yes, you are, do you agree with the president?
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: If you vote for Democrats, you are voting for candidates who are focused on creating jobs, getting the economy turned around and continuing to move us forward, creating more opportunities for people to succeed. If you vote for a Republican, you are voting for someone who has embraced the Tea Party agenda, who would double down on obstruction and who would stop us from moving forward.
. . .
SCARBOROUGH: It's ridiculous. You have people that voted with the president 95, 96, 97, 98% of the time --
MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Who can't say his name.
SCARBOROUGH: Can't say his name. They say: you send me up there, I'm going to be a pain in his backside. It's a joke! It's a clown show!

- See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-fi....QZvrTy5a.dpuf

[JT]

We will see after the mid terms. Just remember, Barry still has his veto pen ready and waiting. It aint over till its over.
Aint America grand!!
Hey JT, in case you didn't know it, I earned my SS and Medicare after working for 50 years. For the man also. So, I'll just keep on keep on sitting on my arse in the boat. Earn yours, I earned mine.

LOL...some how I have a hard time believing you did much else but sit around and complain about the haves vs have nots. I imagine you've done that your entire life.

[boom]

Congressional democrats will fall right in line and start overruling his vetoes. Come on Nov 4th!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[mgstei1]

We will see after the mid terms. Just remember, Barry still has his veto pen ready and waiting. It aint over till its over.
Aint America grand!!
Hey JT, in case you didn't know it, I earned my SS and Medicare after working for 50 years. For the man also. So, I'll just keep on keep on sitting on my arse in the boat. Earn yours, I earned mine.

[Robalo]

rut ro.........

Two weeks before Election Day, most of the nation's likely voters now expect the Republican Party to take control of the U.S. Senate, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll. And by a growing margin, they say that's the outcome they'd like to see.

I guess folks got all the HOPE they could stand and want what CHANGE they have left in their pockets to pay the higher taxes Comrade Obama stuck on the Middle Class while he blew smoke up their azzes while hanging with his 1%er buddies like BNSF Buffett. Buffett's cleaning up on railroads while his bestest lying bud Obama still sits on KXL. I know why but the blind ignorants still think it's because of the 'environment'-yeah sure it is, all the while BNSF is now changing "CHOO CHOO" to "KA CHING".

[boom]

http://youtu.be/OkYnghIrQrA

[boom]

oh my.............

Politics: Bad news for Dems: New AP poll shows women leaning GOP for midterms

[boom]

rut ro.........

Two weeks before Election Day, most of the nation's likely voters now expect the Republican Party to take control of the U.S. Senate, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll. And by a growing margin, they say that's the outcome they'd like to see.