Tweet
Mayor Parker and her so-called anti-discrimination law
Boxbiter Parker-the mayor of Houston, pushed her lesbo/gay/transgender BS too far. LGBT can file complaints if a bizness doesn't let a man take a pee or dump in a woman's bathroom if that man was dressed as a woman. If this sheet passes in Houston, likely "Gay"veston will be next. I can see JT now in a mini-skirt handing out towels to woman in the Ladies room at The Sand Bar-heck, I may even join him-maybe make some offers to help with their zipper/panties??? 
But really folks, where does all this completely nonsensical "political correctness" bullsheet end??? Enough is enough. Gays/Lesbos comprise 4% of the population, why do we need all this gay/lesbo crapola thrown at us for? We don't. It has gone wayyyy too damn far. You want your GF in a ladies bathroom next to some sex freak 'dude' whipping out his weeenie to pee or adjusting his skirt or balls? Or you want some bull dyke trying to pee in the urinal next to you? Helll no.
from today's Chronicle:
Mayor Annise Parker and supporters of her proposed nondiscrimination ordinance announced a compromise Tuesday in hopes of deflecting controversy over a small provision (depends on your size!) that had dominated discussion on the measure. (ha-they said 'measure').
A paragraph specifying that no business open to the public could deny a transgender person entry to the restroom consistent with his or her gender identity had outraged conservatives. Church and Republican political leaders have used the clause to claim the ordinance "provides an opportunity for sexual predators to have access to our families."
Members of the gay, lesbian and transgender community were equally outraged (they threw a hissy fit, tossed their purse to the ground and broke a nail), however, by a clause that would give businesses an out if the defendant had a "good faith belief" that the person's claim of being transgender was disingenuous. (NOTE THE USE OF "DEFENDANT" IN THAT SENTENCE-WTF DOES THAT TELL YOU!! LOTS OF LAWSUITS BY P.O.d GAYS/LESBOS AND IF THEY DIDN'T LIKE THEIR BILL OR SERVICE, THEY"LL FARGING USE THIS BS LAW TO FARK/SUE THAT BIZ).
The proposed amendment would remove that paragraph of the expansive ordinance. Transgender people barred access to a restroom still would be able to file a discrimination complaint to the city's Office of Inspector General under the process outlined for all protected characteristics, such as race and veteran status.
"The base ordinance is still the same," Parker said. "It says you can't discriminate." (Hey Parker, go fark yourself ya Crazy Unacceptable Narcissistic Troublemaker).
Some groups that still oppose the ordinance said they would rally in front of City Hall before an afternoon public comment period expected to last several hours.
BUT WHAT BATHROOM WILL YOU USE MAYOR PORKER?
THIS WHOLE STUPID-AZZ "LAW" IS JUST A WAY FOR A DISPLEASED CUSTOMER TO SUE THE SHEEET OUT OF A BUSINESS AND IS JUST GD STUPID-JUST LIKE THE FARGING MAYOR!!
But really folks, where does all this completely nonsensical "political correctness" bullsheet end??? Enough is enough. Gays/Lesbos comprise 4% of the population, why do we need all this gay/lesbo crapola thrown at us for? We don't. It has gone wayyyy too damn far. You want your GF in a ladies bathroom next to some sex freak 'dude' whipping out his weeenie to pee or adjusting his skirt or balls? Or you want some bull dyke trying to pee in the urinal next to you? Helll no.from today's Chronicle:
Mayor Annise Parker and supporters of her proposed nondiscrimination ordinance announced a compromise Tuesday in hopes of deflecting controversy over a small provision (depends on your size!) that had dominated discussion on the measure. (ha-they said 'measure').
A paragraph specifying that no business open to the public could deny a transgender person entry to the restroom consistent with his or her gender identity had outraged conservatives. Church and Republican political leaders have used the clause to claim the ordinance "provides an opportunity for sexual predators to have access to our families."
Members of the gay, lesbian and transgender community were equally outraged (they threw a hissy fit, tossed their purse to the ground and broke a nail), however, by a clause that would give businesses an out if the defendant had a "good faith belief" that the person's claim of being transgender was disingenuous. (NOTE THE USE OF "DEFENDANT" IN THAT SENTENCE-WTF DOES THAT TELL YOU!! LOTS OF LAWSUITS BY P.O.d GAYS/LESBOS AND IF THEY DIDN'T LIKE THEIR BILL OR SERVICE, THEY"LL FARGING USE THIS BS LAW TO FARK/SUE THAT BIZ).
The proposed amendment would remove that paragraph of the expansive ordinance. Transgender people barred access to a restroom still would be able to file a discrimination complaint to the city's Office of Inspector General under the process outlined for all protected characteristics, such as race and veteran status.
"The base ordinance is still the same," Parker said. "It says you can't discriminate." (Hey Parker, go fark yourself ya Crazy Unacceptable Narcissistic Troublemaker).
Some groups that still oppose the ordinance said they would rally in front of City Hall before an afternoon public comment period expected to last several hours.
BUT WHAT BATHROOM WILL YOU USE MAYOR PORKER?
THIS WHOLE STUPID-AZZ "LAW" IS JUST A WAY FOR A DISPLEASED CUSTOMER TO SUE THE SHEEET OUT OF A BUSINESS AND IS JUST GD STUPID-JUST LIKE THE FARGING MAYOR!!
I have an uncontrolable desire to wanna jerk my rod.
Comment