468x80 Banner

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

louisana limits

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • corndog
    replied
    My mama always told me if you dont have something nice to say dont say nothing at all. This thread shoul be over tried of seeing it pop back up. Nice catch BTW!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • scumLORD
    replied
    I don't get offended by words, especially not from the internet. If you want to keep 25 trout be my guest. I just feel like taking what you need is better than taking just because you can. I hardly even carry a stringer anymore, and if I catch fish and my friends want them to eat for a fry with their family, then I have no problem giving it to them as long as it is good table fare size.

    Leave a comment:


  • B&P
    replied
    Tell me when to get the skillet hot, Sandy.

    Leave a comment:


  • coachlaw
    replied
    I wasn't talking about Ph.D.'s I was talking about a practical education in fisheries and what limits they can support. In Louisiana, it's not about how many, but how many BOXES of fish. I'm hitting it Monday, but in an area I've never fished before. Hopefully I'll have some offensive pics for y'all soon.

    That said, here's a funny pic fa ya mom'n'em.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • ubermensch1324
    replied
    Ha ha ha. Epic picture!!

    Leave a comment:


  • JT
    replied
    and speaking of louisiana limits..i think thats muddskipper in the middle
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • JT
    replied
    Wheres Les Miles when you need him?

    Leave a comment:


  • ubermensch1324
    replied
    Nobody in this thread is offended about it. Education has nothing to do with someone's personal decision to keep or not keep that many fish. I think most everyone here is aware that LA can support keeping them all (this isn't news), but a lot of people still wouldn't want to do it. Everyone here is entitled to their own opinion. Good for them!

    Leave a comment:


  • coachlaw
    replied
    Anyone who is offended by it is under-educated and has obviously not been fishing in the Sportsman's Paradise. Sorry to be judgemental, but as they say here, Dat's da way it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • txwhaler 22
    replied
    Wow I really didnt mean to ruffle anyones
    feathers! Just thought that was a cool pic
    And what fun they must have had catching all those
    Trout!!!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • coachlaw
    replied
    OUCH!

    Leave a comment:


  • JT
    replied
    Who gives a sheeet what they do in Louisiiiaana? Outside of David Duke, theres never been anybody over there thats credible anyway; except for Sandy..............maybe. ok i take that last part back.

    Leave a comment:


  • buoy37
    replied
    Originally posted by scumLORD View Post
    That is just ridiculous..............this is just uncalled for.
    I think these are the phrases that got everyone "excited".

    Personally, I kept less than ten fish from Texas waters last year. However, the wife and I brought home bags and bags of fish from Louisiana guided trips. Now, why would I do this? My fileting skills suck.

    Keep all you can!! Eat all you keep!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • ubermensch1324
    replied
    Originally posted by scumLORD View Post
    I am sure their ecosystem can support that that state is full of fish, I personally would not keep 25 trout. **** cleaning them and finding room for them in my freezer that is already full of fish. I fished sabine once and we murdered them, I kept maybe 5 from the 17-20 in range.
    To be honest I tend to side with scumLORD on this one. I personally wouldn't keep that fish, period. There's a difference between whether or not something's legal and whether or not it's right, and that depends on the individual.

    My philosophy is live and let live. If it ain't hurting me and other people want to do something that's up to them which is why I wouldn't make a big deal out of something like this. But personally, I wouldn't have done it regardless of the ecosystem and just let nature run it's course.

    Saying scum has a lack of knowledge on the subject though is a little harsh considering you don't know what he knows and what he doesn't unless you really know him well. This to me seems like it's up to the individual(s) whether they want to keep that many fish - so criticizing someone's opinion is like saying pepsi is better than coke. It really just depends on the person and what they consider "right."

    On an off note, it's pretty well known that their ecosystem supports that many trout. Still doesn't really change my opinion, though.

    PS - All seriousness aside...DANG that's a lot of fish! Lol!

    Leave a comment:


  • scumLORD
    replied
    I am sure their ecosystem can support that that state is full of fish, I personally would not keep 25 trout. **** cleaning them and finding room for them in my freezer that is already full of fish. I fished sabine once and we murdered them, I kept maybe 5 from the 17-20 in range.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X